首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies in transplant-eligible and ineligible relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis  期刊论文  

  • 编号:
    C2FD314D9DF35245809FC39E6577A57C
  • 作者:
  • 语种:
    英文
  • 期刊:
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH ISSN:2218-676X 2026 年 15 卷 5 期 ; MAY 30
  • 收录:
  • 关键词:
  • 摘要:

    Background: The advent of novel therapies including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), has markedly improved clinical outcomes for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL). However, direct comparisons of efficacy and safety among systemic treatments for R/R LBCL are lacking, complicating clinical decision-making. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to evaluate the systemic therapies across transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients with R/R LBCL. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: The analysis included 14 RCTs comprising a total of 3,329 patients. Among the transplant-eligible cohort (7 evaluated regimens), CAR-T therapies maximized disease control; lisocabtagene maraleucel (lisocel) ranked highest for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.42; 95% credible intervals (CrI): 0.28-0.64] and EFS (HR =0.37, 95% CrI: 0.26-0.54), whereas axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was associated with the highest incidence of grade >= 3 TEAEs [risk ratio (RR) =2.09; 95% CrI: 1.08-4.19]. In the transplant-ineligible cohort (9 evaluated regimens), glofitamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx) ranked highest for PFS (HR =0.32; 95% CrI: 0.23-0.45), while polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) yielded the maximum benefit for OS (HR =0.42; 95% CrI: 0.24-0.73) and ORR [odds ratio (OR) =5.21; 95% CrI: 2.01-14.3]. Both regimens were associated with higher toxicities, but remained overall manageable. Conclusions: This NMA provides a comprehensive comparison of systemic treatment strategies for R/R LBCL regarding efficacy and safety profiles.

  • 推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714:
    Huang Liling,Chen Kai,Wang Min, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies in transplant-eligible and ineligible relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis [J].TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH,2026,15(5).
  • APA:
    Huang Liling,Chen Kai,Wang Min,Guo Chao,&Li Zhenling.(2026).Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies in transplant-eligible and ineligible relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis .TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH,15(5).
  • MLA:
    Huang Liling, et al. "Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies in transplant-eligible and ineligible relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis" .TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH 15,5(2026).
  • 入库时间:
    2026/7/7 15:55:04
  • 更新时间:
    2026/7/7 15:55:04
  • 条目包含文件:
    文件类型:PDF,文件大小:
    正在加载全文
浏览次数:6 下载次数:0
浏览次数:6
下载次数:0
打印次数:1
浏览器支持: Google Chrome   火狐   360浏览器极速模式(8.0+极速模式) 
返回顶部